A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les dernières notices... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Bruno Saragiotto
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la rechercheClinimetric Testing of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire / Bruno Saragiotto in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 48, 12 (Décembre 2018)
[article]
in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy > vol. 48, 12 (Décembre 2018) . - p. 915-922
Titre : Clinimetric Testing of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Bruno Saragiotto ; [et al.] Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 915-922 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:colonne lombaire
[Thésaurus Mesh]Douleur chronique
[Thésaurus Mesh]PsychométrieRésumé : Background
The Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ) is a self-report measure of 15 items. Previous studies have used the LSIQ as a measure of clinical instability; however, a comprehensive evaluation of its clinimetric properties has not been conducted.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the LSIQ in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP).
Methods
In this clinical measurement study, the authors included patients with nonspecific LBP presenting to primary care clinicians in Australia. Rasch analysis was conducted to assess item hierarchy, targeting, unidimensionality, person fit, internal consistency, and differential item functioning. The researchers assessed test-retest reliability of total scores and individual item scores, as well as convergent and divergent validity.
Results
A total of 107 participants with LBP (60 men and 47 women) were recruited. The results were variable. The LSIQ appeared to constitute a unidimensional measure, targeted the sample well, and showed adequate test-retest reliability. However, the scale had poor internal consistency, did not appear to function as an interval-level measure, and had unclear construct validity. Although no items appeared to be redundant, several items were biased by factors other than the proposed construct of the measure.
Conclusion
The LSIQ does not seem to be ready to be implemented in clinical practice and may require theoretical reconsideration. Although the LSIQ provided satisfactory estimates for some clinimetric features, the authors do not consider the instrument to be useful as an interval-level measure but rather as an index. Future studies are needed to investigate whether the LSIQ could measure clinical instability or some other constructPermalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité J Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible A consensus definition of running-related injury in recreational runners : a modified delphi approach / Tié Parma Yamato in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol.45, 5 (Mai 2015)
[article]
in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy > vol.45, 5 (Mai 2015) . - 375-380
Titre : A consensus definition of running-related injury in recreational runners : a modified delphi approach Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Tié Parma Yamato, Auteur ; Bruno Saragiotto, Auteur ; Alexandre Dias Lopes, Auteur Article en page(s) : 375-380 Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]:M:Membre inférieur:Membre inférieur / traumatismes
[Thésaurus Mesh]Consensus
[Thésaurus Mesh]Course à pied
[Thésaurus Mesh]Méthode Delphi
[Thésaurus Mesh]Terminologie comme sujet
[Thésaurus Mesh]Traumatismes sportifsPermalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible Descriptors used to define running-related musculoskeletal injury : a systematic review / Tié Parma Yamato in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol.45, 5 (Mai 2015)
[article]
in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy > vol.45, 5 (Mai 2015) . - 366-374
Titre : Descriptors used to define running-related musculoskeletal injury : a systematic review Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Tié Parma Yamato, Auteur ; Bruno Saragiotto, Auteur ; Luiz Carlos (JR) Hespanhol, Auteur Article en page(s) : 366-374 Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]:A:Appareil locomoteur:Appareil locomoteur / traumatismes
[Thésaurus Mesh]Course à pied
[Thésaurus Mesh]Terminologie comme sujet
[Thésaurus Mesh]Traumatismes sportifsPermalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible The Effectiveness of Strategies to Promote Walking in People With Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis / Bruno Saragiotto in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, Vol. 50, 11 (Novembre 2020)
[article]
in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy > Vol. 50, 11 (Novembre 2020) . - p. 597-606
Titre : The Effectiveness of Strategies to Promote Walking in People With Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Bruno Saragiotto ; [et al.] Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 597-606 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:troubles musculo-squelettiques
[Thésaurus HELB]:Photographie:douleur
[Thésaurus Mesh]Activité motrice
[Thésaurus Mesh]Marche à piedRésumé : Objective
To evaluate the effect of walking promotion strategies on physical activity, pain, and function in people with musculoskeletal disorders.
Design
Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis.
Literature Search
We performed the searches in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) from inception to August 2019.
Study Selection Criteria
We included randomized controlled trials evaluating interventions that promote walking in people with musculoskeletal disorders.
Data Synthesis
We used the PEDro scale for assessing risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate the quality of evidence. We expressed pooled effects for between-group differences as mean differences or standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, or as risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals, using random-effects meta-analyses.
Results
Twelve eligible trials (n = 1456 participants) were identified. There was moderate- to very low–quality evidence of no difference in physical activity levels for walking promotion interventions when compared to minimal interventions, and a significant effect favoring walking promotion when compared with usual care in the short term. There was moderate-quality evidence that walking promotion was modestly effective for reducing pain and improving function compared with minimal intervention and usual care. There was no difference in pain and function for walking promotion compared to supervised exercise. Walking promotion was not associated with different rates of adverse events compared to control conditions.
Conclusion
Strategies to promote walking did not increase physical activity in people with musculoskeletal disorders. Walking promotion was associated with small improvements in pain and function compared to minimal intervention and usual carePermalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité J Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible