A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les dernières notices... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Brittney Mazzone
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la rechercheHigh-Level Performance After the Return to Run Clinical Pathway in Patients Using the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis / Brittney Mazzone in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 49, 7 (Juillet 2019)
[article]
in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy > vol. 49, 7 (Juillet 2019) . - p. 529-535
Titre : High-Level Performance After the Return to Run Clinical Pathway in Patients Using the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Brittney Mazzone ; [et al.], Auteur Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 529-535 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:exosquelette
[Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:Orthèse
[Thésaurus Mesh]ChevilleRésumé : Background
Severe ankle and foot injuries in the US military can result in high-level functional limitation, lost duty days, and medical discharge.
Objective
To assess the effectiveness of the Return to Run Clinical Pathway (RTR) in returning patients with lower extremity fractures who utilized the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) to high-level mobility.
Methods
Thirty servicemembers with lower extremity fractures who utilized the IDEO unilaterally and completed the RTR at Naval Medical Center San Diego were included in this retrospective operational review. The Comprehensive High-level Activity Mobility Predictor (CHAMP) and all subtests were completed prior to and after completion of the RTR as part of routine clinical care. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare CHAMP scores before and after the RTR.
Results
Significant improvements were found in the T test (mean change, faster by 5.3 seconds; 95% confidence interval: 3.6, 7.1 seconds; P = .03) and total CHAMP score (mean change, 4.2 points; 95% confidence interval: 3.0, 5.3 points; P<.05). No significant changes were noted in the single-legged stance subtest, the Edgren sidestep test, or the Illinois agility test.
Conclusion
The RTR led to improvements in high-level, multidirectional mobility in IDEO users with a history of fractures. Applicability of the intervention used in this study requires further validation before widespread use.
Level of Evidence Therapy, level 4Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité J Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible Spine kinematics during prone extension in people with and without low back pain and among classification-specific low back pain subgroups / Ron Wood in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 46, 7 (Juillet 2016)
[article]
in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy > vol. 46, 7 (Juillet 2016) . - p. 571-579
Titre : Spine kinematics during prone extension in people with and without low back pain and among classification-specific low back pain subgroups Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Ron Wood ; Brittney Mazzone ; Sara Gombatto, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : p. 571-579 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]:R:Rachis:Rachis / anatomopathologie Résumé : Study Design Cross-sectional observational design.
Background
Spine extension is used in physical therapy during examination and treatment for low back pain (LBP). However, kinematics during prone extension have not been examined using 3-D motion capture.
Objectives
The primary purpose was to determine differences in spine kinematics during prone extension between subjects with and without LBP. An exploratory analysis was conducted to examine kinematic differences among LBP subgroups.
Methods
Kinematics of the thoracic and lumbar spine were examined during prone extension, using optical motion capture, in 18 subjects with LBP and 17 subjects without LBP (control group). Excursion of each spinal region was calculated for the entire movement and during 25% increments of extension movement duration. Subjects with LBP were examined and assigned to subgroups using 3 different classification systems for LBP. Repeated-measures analysis-of-variance tests were used to examine effects of group (LBP, control), spine region, and increment of movement duration, and to explore effects of LBP subgroup.
Results
For spine kinematics, there was a significant group-by-region interaction effect (P<.05). Subjects with LBP displayed less lower lumbar extension (13.3° ± 4.9°) than control subjects (21.4° ± 9.2°). The majority of lower lumbar extension occurred during the first 50% of the motion for subjects with LBP. Subgroup-by-region interaction effects were significant for 2 of 3 LBP classification systems (P<.05).
Conclusion
Subjects with LBP displayed less lower lumbar extension than control subjects during prone extension. These differences should be considered when evaluating and prescribing prone extension. The interpretation of subgroup differences with prone extension kinematics is limited in the current study by the small sample size, but may need to be considered in future studies of spine kinematics.
Level of Evidence Diagnosis, level 4.Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité J Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible