A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les dernières notices... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Javier Martinez-Calderon
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la rechercheA Call for Improving Research on Pain Neuroscience Education and Chronic Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews / Javier Martinez-Calderon in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 53,06 (juin 2023)
[article]
in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy > vol. 53,06 (juin 2023) . - p. 353-368
Titre : A Call for Improving Research on Pain Neuroscience Education and Chronic Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Javier Martinez-Calderon ; [et al.] Année de publication : 2023 Article en page(s) : p. 353-368 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]Fibromyalgie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Revue de la littératureRésumé : OBJECTIVE: We aimed to summarize the evidence of the effects of pain neuroscience education delivered alone or combined with other interventions for chronic pain.
DESIGN: An overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis.
LITERATURE SEARCH: CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), Embase, PsycINFO (via ProQuest), PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception to November 14, 2022.
STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Systematic reviews (SRs) with meta-analyses including randomized clinical trials. The outcomes were pain and psychological symptoms.
DATA SYNTHESIS: AMSTAR 2 assessed the methodological quality of SRs. The primary study overlap was evaluated by calculating the corrected covered area (CCA).
RESULTS: We included 8 SRs including 30 meta-analyses of interest that comprised 28 distinct clinical trials. In some meta-analyses, pain neuroscience education delivered alone or combined with other interventions was more effective than control interventions for reducing pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, anxiety symptoms, and depression symptoms at some time points. However, other meta-analyses found a lack of effects of pain neuroscience education, and there were inconsistencies between meta-analyses covering the same outcome. The methodological quality of all SRs was critically low. The overlap, including all SRs, was high (CCA = 13%), and very high for SRs covering trials on chronic low back pain (CCA = 40%), chronic spine pain (CCA = 27%), and fibromyalgia (CCA = 25%).
CONCLUSION: It is impossible to make clear clinical recommendations for delivering pain neuroscience education based on current meta-analyses. Action is needed to increase and improve the quality of SRs in the field of pain neuroscience education.Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire “My Pain Is Unbearable…I Cannot Recognize Myself!” Emotions, Cognitions, and Behaviors of People Living With Musculoskeletal Disorders: An Umbrella Review / Javier Martinez-Calderon in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, Vol. 52, 5 (Mai 2022)
[article]
in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy > Vol. 52, 5 (Mai 2022) . - p. 243-A102
Titre : “My Pain Is Unbearable…I Cannot Recognize Myself!” Emotions, Cognitions, and Behaviors of People Living With Musculoskeletal Disorders: An Umbrella Review Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Javier Martinez-Calderon ; [et al.], Auteur Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : p. 243-A102 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:troubles musculo-squelettiques
[Thésaurus Mesh]Cognition
[Thésaurus Mesh]ÉmotionsRésumé : Objective
To summarize (1) the emotions, cognitions, and behaviors of people who are living with musculoskeletal disorders related to symptoms and (2) the interactions of emotions, cognitions, and behaviors with the person's environment (family, social, and work roles).
Design
An umbrella review of qualitative research syntheses and meta-summaries (metasynthesis, meta-ethnographies, meta-aggregation, meta-summary).
Literature Search
We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycARTICLES, PsycEXTRA, PsycINFO, PubMed, and PubPsych from database inception to January 2021. We also searched gray literature via Open Grey and Google Scholar.
Study Selection Criteria
We included qualitative evidence syntheses evaluating adults with musculoskeletal disorders, based on the multidimensional diagnostic criteria for acute and chronic pain. Emotions, cognitions, and behaviors were the phenomenon of interest.
Data Synthesis
We developed 3 categories of themes ([1] emotions, [2] cognitions, and [3] behaviors) for each objective. We selected the 3 most common emotions, cognitions, and behaviors that appear as themes in our narrative synthesis.
Results
We included 20 qualitative evidence syntheses that retrieved 284 original qualitative studies. Despair, distress, and fear were the main emotions reported by people living with musculoskeletal disorders. The alterations of the self and how people described their symptoms, what caused them, and how the symptoms impacted their lives were the most common cognitions. Cognitive strategies (ie, acceptance) and perceptions about social support emerged. People often used passive behaviors (eg, social isolation or hiding symptoms) to cope with the challenges that arose related to musculoskeletal symptoms. However, some people actively faced their symptoms, planning their activities or practicing them despite their symptoms.
Conclusion
Clinicians who support people living with musculoskeletal disorders should consider (1) assessing other emotions than pain-related fear (eg, despair and distress), (2) observing their cognitive responses (ie, acceptance), and (3) evaluating what type of behaviors people use (eg, active or passivePermalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité J Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible Which Interventions Enhance Pain Self-efficacy in People With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, Including Over 12 000 Participants / Javier Martinez-Calderon in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 50, 8 (Aout 2020)
[article]
in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy > vol. 50, 8 (Aout 2020) . - p. 418-430
Titre : Which Interventions Enhance Pain Self-efficacy in People With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, Including Over 12 000 Participants Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Javier Martinez-Calderon ; [et al.] Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 418-430 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:douleur chronique
[Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:Méta-analyses
[Thésaurus Mesh]Maladies ostéomusculaires
[Thésaurus Mesh]Revue de la littératureRésumé : Objective
To find out which interventions enhance pain self-efficacy in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain and to evaluate the reporting of interventions designed to enhance pain self-efficacy.
Design: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis.
Literature Search
PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PEDro, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception up to September 2019.
Study Selection Criteria
Randomized controlled trials evaluating pain self-efficacy as a primary or secondary outcome in chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Data Synthesis
We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to evaluate the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence, respectively.
Results
Sixty randomized controlled trials were included (12 415 participants). There was a small effect of multicomponent, psychological, and exercise interventions improving pain self-efficacy at follow-ups of 0 to 3 months, a small effect of exercise and multicomponent interventions enhancing pain self-efficacy at follow-ups of 4 to 6 months, and a small effect of multicomponent interventions improving pain self-efficacy at follow-ups of 7 to 12 months. No interventions improved pain self-efficacy after 12 months. Self-management interventions did not improve pain self-efficacy at any follow-up time. Risk of bias, the nature of the control group, and the instrument to assess pain self-efficacy moderated the effects of psychological therapies at follow-ups of 7 to 12 months. The certainty of the evidence for all included interventions was low, due to serious risk of bias and indirectness. No trial reported the intervention in sufficient detail to allow full replication.
Conclusion
There was low-quality evidence of a small effect of multicomponent exercise and psychological interventions improving pain self-efficacy in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain.Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité J Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible