A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les dernières notices... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Jan Roelof Polling
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherchePhysical Activity Spaces Not Effective against Socioeconomic Inequalities in Myopia Incidence: The Generation R Study / Clair A. Enthoven in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 98,12 (Décembre 2021)
[article]
in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science > vol. 98,12 (Décembre 2021)
Titre : Physical Activity Spaces Not Effective against Socioeconomic Inequalities in Myopia Incidence: The Generation R Study Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Clair A. Enthoven ; Famke J. M. Mölenberg ; J. Willem L. Tideman ; Jan Roelof Polling ; Jeremy A. Labrecque ; Hein Raat ; Frank J. van Lenthe ; Caroline C. W. Klaver Année de publication : 2021 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]Activité motrice
[Thésaurus Mesh]Caractéristiques de la population
[Thésaurus Mesh]Collecte de données
[Thésaurus Mesh]Disparités de l'état de santé
[Thésaurus Mesh]Enfant
[Thésaurus Mesh]Facteurs socioéconomiques
[Thésaurus Mesh]Lumière solaire
[Thésaurus Mesh]Myopie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Pays-Bas
[Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:écrans numériquesMots-clés : activité a l’extérieur Résumé : SIGNIFICANCE
Our findings show that non-Dutch background, lower maternal education, and lower net household income level may be new risk factors for myopia development in the Netherlands. Newly introduced physical activity spaces may not be effective enough in increasing outdoor exposure in children to reduce eye growth.
PURPOSE
The aims of this study were to evaluate socioeconomic inequalities in myopia incidence, eye growth, outdoor exposure, and computer use and to investigate if newly introduced physical activity spaces can reduce eye growth in school-aged children.
METHODS
Participants (N = 2643) from the Dutch population–based birth cohort Generation R were examined at ages 6 and 9 years. Socioeconomic inequalities in myopia incidence, eye growth, and lifestyle were determined using regression analyses. Information on physical activity spaces located in Rotterdam was obtained. Differences in eye growth between those who became exposed to new physical activity spaces (n = 230) and those nonexposed (n = 1866) were evaluated with individual-level fixed-effects models.
RESULTS
Myopia prevalence was 2.2% at age 6 years and 12.2% at age 9 years. Outdoor exposure was 11.4 h/wk at age 6 years and 7.4 h/wk at age 9 years. Computer use was 2.1 h/wk at age 6 years and 5.2 h/wk at age 9 years. Myopia incidence was higher in children with non-Dutch background, and families with lower household income and lower maternal education (odds ratio [OR], 1.081 [95% confidence interval, 1.052 to 1.112]; OR, 1.035 [95% confidence interval, 1.008 to 1.063]; OR, 1.028 [95% confidence interval, 1.001 to 1.055], respectively). Children living <600 m of a physical activity space did not have increased outdoor exposure, except those from families with lower maternal education (β = 1.33 h/wk; 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 2.51 h/wk). Newly introduced physical activity spaces were not associated with reduction of eye growth.
CONCLUSIONS
Children from socioeconomically disadvantaged families became more often myopic than those from socioeconomically advantaged families. We did not find evidence that physical activity spaces protect against myopia for the population at large, but subgroups may benefit.Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire Randomized Controlled Trial of a Spectacle Lens for Macular Degeneration / Martijn S. Visser in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 97, 10 (Octobre 2020)
[article]
in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science > vol. 97, 10 (Octobre 2020)
Titre : Randomized Controlled Trial of a Spectacle Lens for Macular Degeneration Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Martijn S. Visser ; Reinier Timman ; Joanneke Kampen-Smalbrugge ; Jan Roelof Polling Année de publication : 2020 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]:A:Acuité visuelle:Acuité visuelle / effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques
[Thésaurus Mesh]Dégénérescence maculaire
[Thésaurus Mesh]Lentilles optiques
[Thésaurus Mesh]Lunettes correctrices
[Thésaurus Mesh]Qualité de vie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Troubles de la vision
[Thésaurus Mesh]Vision oculaireRésumé : SIGNIFICANCE: E-Scoop, a spectacle lens, provides no clinically relevant improvements on quality of life, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity for patients with AMD. Because patients' burden is high and therapeutic options are scarce, the incentive to develop effective vision rehabilitation interventions remains. PURPOSE: Patients with AMD experience low quality of life due to vision loss, despite angiogenesis inhibitor interventions that slow down progression for some patients. E-Scoop, which includes low-power prisms, 6% magnification, yellow tint, and antireflection coating, might aid in daily activities by improving distance viewing. Separately, these features have little proven effectiveness. E-Scoop has not been formally tested. This study aimed to determine the impact of E-Scoop on quality of life and the effect on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. METHODS: In this randomized controlled, open-label trial, 190 of 226 eligible patients were included. The primary outcome was quality of life measured with the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. The follow-up for quality of life was after 6 weeks for controls and after 3 weeks of use for E-Scoop wearers. The visual measures were repeated after 6 weeks, with optimal refractive correction, with and without E-Scoop. RESULTS: Randomization resulted in 99 E-Scoop and 86 control group patients for intention-to-treat analysis. No differential change was found between the E-Scoop and control groups on the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire using Rasch analysis (Cohen d = −0.07, P = .53). Statistically significant but small effects were found in favor of E-Scoop on binocular visual acuity (mean difference, 0.05 logMAR [2.5 letters, P < .001]) and contrast sensitivity (mean difference, 0.10 logCS [2 letters, P < .001]). CONCLUSIONS: No effect of E-Scoop on quality of life was found. E-Scoop showed effects that were statistically significant, although not clinically meaningful and within typical variability, on visual measures. Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire