A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les dernières notices... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Nilgu¨n Bek
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la rechercheAre Biomechanical Features of the Foot and Ankle Related to Lumbopelvic Motor Control? / Caner Kararti in Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol. 111, 03 (Mai-juin 2021)
[article]
in Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association > Vol. 111, 03 (Mai-juin 2021)
Titre : Are Biomechanical Features of the Foot and Ankle Related to Lumbopelvic Motor Control? Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Caner Kararti ; Sevil Bilgin ; Yeliz Dadali ; Buket Büyükturan ; Öznur Büyükturan ; Nilgu¨n Bek Année de publication : 2021 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:biomécanique
[Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:Pression plantaire
[Thésaurus Mesh]Cheville
[Thésaurus Mesh]Périnée
[Thésaurus Mesh]Pied
[Thésaurus Mesh]Vertèbres lombalesRésumé : Background: Any pathomechanical change in the foot or ankle is expected to cause adverse biomechanical effects on the lumbopelvic region. However, no objective data can be found in the literature regarding the effects of musculus transversus abdominis (mTrA) and musculus lumbar multifidus (mLM), which are effective muscles in lumbopelvic motor control, or regarding the extent of their effects. Methods: Sixty-four healthy young adults were assessed by a physiotherapist (C.K.) experienced in treating feet and a radiologist (Y.D.) specialized in muscular imaging. In the determination of biomechanical properties of the foot, the navicular drop test (NDT), Foot Posture Index (FPI), pedobarographic plantar pressure analysis, and isokinetic strength dynamometer measurements were used in determining the strength of the muscles around the ankle. Ultrasonographic imaging was used to determine mTrA and mLM thicknesses. Results: Significant correlation was found between NDT results and mTrA and mLM thicknesses (P , .05) and between FPI results and mTrA thicknesses (P , .05). As the peak pressure of the foot medial line increased, mTrA and mLM thicknesses decreased (P , .05). Although dorsiflexion muscle strength was also effective, mTrA and mLM thicknesses were found to increase especially as plantarflexion muscle strength increased (P , .05). Conclusions: These results show that the biomechanical and musculoskeletal properties of the foot-ankle are associated with lumbopelvic stability Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire Effects of Different External Supports on Plantar PressureTime Integral and Contact Area in Flexible Flatfoot / Banu U¨ nver in Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol. 111, 03 (Mai-juin 2021)
[article]
in Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association > Vol. 111, 03 (Mai-juin 2021)
Titre : Effects of Different External Supports on Plantar PressureTime Integral and Contact Area in Flexible Flatfoot Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Banu U¨ nver ; Nilgu¨n Bek Année de publication : 2021 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:Pression plantaire
[Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:taping
[Thésaurus Mesh]Orthèses de pied
[Thésaurus Mesh]Pied platMots-clés : pied plat flexible Résumé : Background: Flexible flatfoot disturbs the load distribution of the foot. Various external supports are used to prevent abnormal plantar loading in flexible flatfoot. However, few studies have compared the effects of different external supports on plantar loading in flexible flatfoot. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of elastic taping, nonelastic taping, and custom-made foot orthoses on plantar pressure-time integral and contact area in flexible flatfoot. Methods: Twenty-seven participants with flexible flatfoot underwent dynamic pedobarographic analysis while barefoot and with elastic tape, nonelastic tape, and custom-made foot orthoses. Results: Pressure-time integral percentage was higher with foot orthoses than in the barefoot and taping conditions in the midfoot (P , .001) and was lower with foot orthoses than in barefoot in the right forefoot (P , .05). Pressure-time integral values were lower with foot orthoses in the second, third, and fourth metatarsals and the lateral heel (P , .05). With foot orthoses, contact area values were higher in the toes; second, third, and fourth metatarsi; midfoot; and heel compared with the other conditions (P , .05). Pressure-time integral in the right lateral heel and contact area in the left fourth metatarsal increased with nonelastic taping versus barefoot (P , .05). Conclusions: Foot orthoses are more effective in providing dynamic pressure redistribution in flexible flatfoot. Although nonelastic taping has some effects, taping methods may be insufficient in altering the measured pedobarographic values in this condition. Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire