A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les dernières notices... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Paul Joret
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la rechercheClinical Comparison of High-resolution and Standard Refractions and Prescriptions / Dawn Meyer in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 100, 11 (Novembre 2023)
[article]
in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science > vol. 100, 11 (Novembre 2023)
Titre : Clinical Comparison of High-resolution and Standard Refractions and Prescriptions Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Dawn Meyer ; Martin Rickert ; Olivia Reed ; Paul Joret ; Pete Kollbaum Année de publication : 2023 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:prescription
[Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:Verres progressifs
[Thésaurus Mesh]Étude comparative
[Thésaurus Mesh]Optométrie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Réfraction oculaireMots-clés : Comparaison clinique technologie de réfraction haute résolution Résumé : SIGNIFICANCE: Recently, novel refraction technology allows subjective refractions to be performed with a higher-resolution. Itis unclear, however,if these benefits are noticed and appreciated by the patient during the examination and after dispensing. PURPOSE: This study investigated benefits and drawbacks of high-resolution refraction technology over standard, specifically in terms of the refraction, glasses prescription, and participant's perceptions of the technology. METHODS: Sixty progressive-addition-lens wearers (aged 35 to 70 years) and 60 single-vision wearers (18 years or older) were randomized to a high-resolution refraction (Vision-R 800; Essilor Instruments, Dallas, TX; essilorinstrumentsusa.com) and standard refraction in a 2-week crossover dispensing design. Refractive results were converted to M, J0, and J45 and analyzed using multivariate t tests. Bayesian estimation was used to analyze differences between refraction type and age group for subjective outcomes. RESULTS: Differences in refractive error between the two refractions were small, and none differed statistically (P > .05) or clinically (e.g., Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire