A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les dernières notices... |
Descripteurs (mots clés)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche
Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
[article]
in OPTOMETRY TODAY > vol. 59, 7 (Juillet 2019) . - p. 67-71
Titre : Homeless shouldn't mean sightless Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Alison Alderson Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 67-71 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]:M:Maladies de l'oeil:Maladies de l'oeil / diagnostic
[Thésaurus Mesh]Sans-abri
[Thésaurus HELB]:Optique:soins oculairesMots-clés : eye care homeless eye diseases diagnosis Résumé : This article discusses the barriers faced by homeless people in accessing eye care, the prevalence of uncorrected refractive error, and the difference an eye examination can make to this vulnerable population Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité O Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible Indicators for Assessing the Quality of Refractive Error Care / Ling Lee in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 98, 01 (Janvier 2021)
[article]
in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science > vol. 98, 01 (Janvier 2021)
Titre : Indicators for Assessing the Quality of Refractive Error Care Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Ling Lee ; Anthea M. Burnett ; Fabrizio D'Esposito ; Tim Fricke ; Long Tien Nguyen ; Duong Anh Vuong ; Hien Thi Thu Nguyen ; Suit May Ho Année de publication : 2021 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]:T:Troubles de la vision:Troubles de la vision / prévention et contrôle
[Thésaurus Mesh]Thérapeutique
[Thésaurus Mesh]Troubles de la réfraction oculaire
[Thésaurus Mesh]Troubles de la vision
[Thésaurus HELB]:Optique:soins oculairesRésumé : SIGNIFICANCE: Quality refractive error care is essential for reducing vision impairment. Quality indicators and
standardized approaches for assessing the quality of refractive error care need to be established.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a set of indicators for assessing the quality of refractive error care and test
their applicability in a real-world setting using unannounced standardized patients (USPs).
METHODS: Patient outcomes and three quality of refractive error care (Q.REC) indicators (1, optimally prescribed
spectacles; 2, adequately prescribed spectacles; 3, vector dioptric distance) were developed using existing literature, refraction training standards, and consulting educators. Twenty-one USPs with various refractive errors were
trained to visit optical stores across Vietnam to have a refraction, observe techniques, and order spectacles. Spectacles were assessed against each Q.REC indicator and tested for associations with vision and comfort.
RESULTS: Overall, 44.1% (184/417) of spectacles provided good vision and comfort. Of the spectacles that met
Q.REC indicators 1 and 2, 62.5 and 54.9%, respectively, provided both good vision and comfort. Optimally prescribed spectacles (indicator 1) were significantly more likely to provide good vision and comfort independently
compared with spectacles that did not meet any indicator (good vision: 94.6 vs. 85.0%, P = .01; comfortable:
66.1 vs. 36.3%, P < .01). Adequately prescribed spectacles (indicator 2) were more likely to provide good comfort
compared with spectacles not meeting any indicator (57.7 vs. 36.3%, P < .01); however, vision outcomes were not
significantly different (85.9 vs. 85.0%, P = .90). Good vision was associated with a lower mean vector dioptric distance (P < .01) but not with comfort (P = .52).
CONCLUSIONS: The optimally prescribed spectacles indicator is a promising approach for assessing the quality of
refractive error care without additional assessments of vision and comfort. Using USPs is a practical approach and
could be used as a standardized method for evaluating the quality of refractive error care.Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire Interventions to mitigate cognitive biases in the decision making of eye care professionals / Aron shlonsky in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 96, 11 (Novembre 2019)
[article]
in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science > vol. 96, 11 (Novembre 2019)
Titre : Interventions to mitigate cognitive biases in the decision making of eye care professionals Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Aron shlonsky ; Rebecca Featherston ; Karyn L. Galvin ; Adam Vogel ; Catherine Granger ; Courtney Lewis ; Laura E. Downie Année de publication : 2019 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]Dépistage visuel
[Thésaurus Mesh]Ophtalmologie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Prise de décision clinique
[Thésaurus Mesh]Recherche
[Thésaurus Mesh]Revue de la littérature
[Thésaurus HELB]:Optique:soins oculaires
[Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:erreur de diagnosticRésumé : SIGNIFICANCE: Cognitive biases, systematic errors in thinking that impact a person's choices and judgments, can
influence decision making at various points during patient care provision. These biases can potentially result in
misdiagnoses, delayed clinical care, and/or patient mismanagement. A range of interventions exists to mitigate
cognitive biases. There is a need to understand the relative efficacy of these interventions within the context of
eye care practice.
PURPOSE: The aimof this systematic review was to synthesize the evidence relating to interventions for mitigating
cognitive biases associated with clinical decision making by eye care professionals.
DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (including Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO) were searched
from inception to October 2017 for studies investigating interventions intended to mitigate cognitive biases in
the clinical decision making of eye care professionals. This review was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: To ensure inclusion of all relevant literature, a wide range of study designs was
eligible for inclusion, such as randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized trials, interrupted time series and repeated
measures, controlled before-after studies, and qualitative studies that were a component of any of these
quantitative study designs.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two review authors independently screened titles, abstracts,
and full-text articles in duplicate, applying a priori eligibility criteria.
RESULTS: After screening 2759 nonduplicate records, including full-text screening of 201 articles, no relevant
studies were identified.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS: Given that cognitive biases can significantly impact the accuracy
of clinical decision making and thus can have major effects on clinical care and patient health outcomes,
the lack of studies identified in this systematic review indicates a critical need for research within the area of cognitive
bias mitigation for decision making within eye care practice.Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire
[article]
in OPTOMETRY TODAY > vol. 58, 09 (Septembre 2018) . - p. 67-70
Titre : Providing domicilary eyecare Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Sanjiv Koasha Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 67-70 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]Personnes handicapées mentales
[Thésaurus Mesh]Sujet âgé
[Thésaurus Mesh]Tests de vision
[Thésaurus HELB]:Optique:soins oculaires
[Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:DomicileMots-clés : home disabled persons aged vision tests eyecare Résumé : This article outlines the regulation relating to domiciliary eyecare, the clinical callenges, and the dispensing considerations when examining patients in their own home Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité O Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible Topical review: Task shifting and the recruitment and retention of eye health workers in underserved areas / Joel G. Somerville in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 103, 03 (Mars 2024)
[article]
in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science > vol. 103, 03 (Mars 2024)
Titre : Topical review: Task shifting and the recruitment and retention of eye health workers in underserved areas Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Joel G. Somerville ; Niall C. Strang ; Sven Jonuscheit Année de publication : 2024 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]:C:Cécité:Cécité / prévention et contrôle
[Thésaurus Mesh]Disparités d'accès aux soins
[Thésaurus Mesh]Ophtalmologie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Optométrie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Organisation mondiale de la santé
[Thésaurus HELB]:Optique:soins oculairesMots-clés : Populations vulnérables, issues des minorités, ou avec disparité de santé monde rurale stratégie Résumé : SIGNIFICANCE
Many populations experience difficulty accessing eye care, especially in rural areas. Implementing workforce recruitment and retention strategies, as well as task shifting through widening scope of practice, can improve eye care accessibility. This article provides novel evidence on the compatibility of these strategies aimed at enhancing ophthalmic workforce recruitment, retention, and efficacy.
PURPOSE
The global burden of blindness is unequally distributed, affects rural areas more, and is frequently associated with limited access to eye care. The World Health Organization has specified both task shifting and increasing human resources for eye health as instruments to improve access to eye care in underserved areas. However, it is uncertain whether these two instruments are sufficiently compatible to provide positive synergic effects. To address this uncertainty, we conducted a structured literature review and synthesized relevant evidence relating to task shifting, workforce recruitment, retention, and eye care. Twenty-three studies from across the globe were analyzed and grouped into three categories: studies exploring recruitment and retention in human resources for eye health in general, studies discussing the relationship between task shifting and recruitment or retention of health workers in general, and studies specifically discussing task shifting and recruitment or retention in eye care workers.
FINDINGS
Our findings demonstrate that incentives are effective for initiating task shifting and improving recruitment and retention in rural areas with a stronger effect noted in midlevel eye care professionals and trainees. Incentives can take various forms, e.g., financial and nonfinancial. The consideration of context-specific motivational factors is essential when designing strategies to facilitate task shifting and to improve recruitment and retention.Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire Trust and Access: Eye Information-seeking Practices and Preferences among Canadians / Marlee M. Spafford in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, Vol.100, 07 (Juillet 2023)
Permalink