[article] in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy > vol. 53,08 (août 2023) . - p. 420-459 Titre : | Resistance, Motor Control, and Mindfulness-Based Exercises Are Effective for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Dose-Response Meta-Regression | Type de document : | article de périodique | Auteurs : | Jullian Mueller ; [et al.] | Année de publication : | 2023 | Article en page(s) : | p. 420-459 | Langues : | Français (fre) | Descripteurs (mots clés) : | [Thésaurus Mesh]Cervicalgie [Thésaurus Mesh]Méta-analyse [Thésaurus Mesh]Pleine conscience
| Résumé : | OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze the effects and dose-response relationship of the most effective exercises for improving pain and disability in people with chronic nonspecific neck pain.
DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis.
LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the PubMed, PEDro, and CENTRAL databases from their inception to September 30, 2022.
STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials that involved people with chronic neck pain adopting a longitudinal exercise intervention and assessed one pain and/or disability outcome.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects meta-analyses were modeled separately for resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises; standardized mean differences (Hedge's g, standardized mean difference [SMD]) were effect estimators. Meta-regressions (dependent variable: effect sizes of the interventions; independent variables: training dose and control group effects) were conducted to explore the dose-response relationship for therapy success of any exercise type.
RESULTS: We included 68 trials. Compared to true control, effects on pain and disability were significantly larger for resistance exercise (pain: SMD, −1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.26, −0.28; |2 = 96%; disability: SMD, −1.76; 95% CI: −3.16, −0.37; |2 = 98%), motor control exercise (pain: SMD, −2.29; 95% CI: −3.82, −0.75; |2 = 98%; disability: SMD, −2.42; 95% CI: −3.38, −1.47; |2 = 94%), and Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise (pain: SMD, 1.91; 95% CI:−3.28, −0.55; |2 = 96%; disability: SMD, −0.62; 95% CI: −0.85, −0.38; |2 = 0%). Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise was more effective than other exercises (SMD, −0.84; 95% CI: −1.553, −0.13; |2 = 86%) for reducing pain. For disability, motor control exercise was superior to other exercises (SMD, −0.70; 95% CI: −1.23, −0.17; |2 = 98%). There was no dose-response relationship for resistance exercise (R2 = 0.32). Higher frequencies (estimate = −0.10) and longer durations (estimate = −0.11) of motor control exercise had larger effects on pain (R2 = 0.72). Longer sessions (estimate = −0.13) of motor control exercise had larger effects on disability (R2 = 0.61).
CONCLUSION: Resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises were effective for reducing neck pain (very low– to moderate-certainty evidence). Higher frequencies and longer duration of sessions had a significant effect on pain for motor control exercise. | Permalink : | https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= |
[article]
| |