A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les dernières notices... |
Descripteurs (mots clés)
Thésaurus Mesh
> M > Myopie
Myopie
A refractive error in which rays of light entering the EYE parallel to the optic axis are brought to a focus in front of the RETINA when accommodation (ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR) is relaxed. This results from an overly curved CORNEA or from the eyeball being too long from front to back. It is also called nearsightedness.
Relation(s)
- voir aussi au terme générique : [Descripteurs (mots clés)] Troubles de la réfraction oculaire
- voir aussi au terme spécifique : [Descripteurs (mots clés)] Myopie dégénérative
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche
Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
2020 Charles F. Prentice Lecture: I Can See Clearly Now / Karla Zadnik in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 100, 01 (Janvier 2023)
[article]
in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science > vol. 100, 01 (Janvier 2023)
Titre : 2020 Charles F. Prentice Lecture: I Can See Clearly Now Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Karla Zadnik Année de publication : 2023 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]:M:Myopie:Myopie / étiologie
[Thésaurus Mesh]:M:Myopie:Myopie / thérapie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Myopie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Optométrie
[Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:recherche médicaleMots-clés : ralentir de la progression Résumé : ABSTRACT: The Charles F. Prentice Medal, which was first given the year I was born, is the highest research honor bestowed by the American Academy of Optometry. I received the Prentice Medal in 2020 and gave my presentation at the 2020 American Academy of Optometry meeting, which was entirely virtual. As the first female optometrist to receive the Prentice Medal, I am honored to be given the opportunity to provide this summary of my presentation. Myopia treatment choices to slow the progression of juvenile-onset myopia, especially in the first year of treatment, range from spectacles to contact lenses to pharmaceuticals. The value of the work described here that aims to predict the onset of myopia in children based on measurements that could be made by the optometrist is about to become more relevant than ever. What if the age-specific cutpoints could be used to use a low-risk treatment that would actually prevent the development of myopia altogether? Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire A 3-year randomized clinical trial of misight lenses for myopia control / Paul Chamberlain in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 96, 08 (Aout 2019)
[article]
in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science > vol. 96, 08 (Aout 2019)
Titre : A 3-year randomized clinical trial of misight lenses for myopia control Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Paul Chamberlain ; Sofia C. Peixoto-de-Matos ; Nicola Logan ; Cheryl Ngo ; Deborah Jones ; Graeme Young Année de publication : 2019 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]Essai clinique
[Thésaurus Mesh]Lentilles de contact
[Thésaurus Mesh]Lentilles de contact hydrophiles
[Thésaurus Mesh]MyopieRésumé : SIGNIFICANCE Results of this randomized, double-masked clinical trial demonstrate the effectiveness of the MiSight soft contact lens in slowing myopia progression over multiple years.
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to quantify the effectiveness of MiSight daily disposable soft contact lens in slowing the progression of juvenile-onset myopia.
METHODS Myopic children (spherical equivalent refraction, −0.75 to −4.00 D; astigmatism, <1.00 D) aged 8 to 12 years with no prior contact lens experience were enrolled in a 3-year, double-masked, randomized clinical trial at four investigational sites in four countries. Subjects in each group were matched for age, sex, and ethnicity and were randomized to either a MiSight 1-day contact lens (test) or Proclear 1-day (control; omafilcon A) and worn on a daily disposable basis. Primary outcome measures were the change in cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction and axial length.
RESULTS Of the subjects enrolled, 75.5% (109/144) completed the clinical trial (53 test, 56 control). Unadjusted change in spherical equivalent refraction was −0.73 D (59%) less in the test group than in the control group (−0.51 ± 0.64 vs. –1.24 ± 0.61 D, P < .001). Mean change in axial length was 0.32 mm (52%) less in the test group than in the control group (0.30 ± 0.27 vs. 0.62 ± 0.30 mm, P < .001). Changes in spherical equivalent refraction and axial length were highly correlated (r = −0.90, P < .001). Over the course of the study, there were no cases of serious ocular adverse events reported. Four asymptomatic corneal infiltrative (one test, three control) events were observed at scheduled study visits.
CONCLUSIONS Results of this clinical trial demonstrate the effectiveness of the MiSight daily disposable soft contact lens in slowing change in spherical equivalent refraction and axial length.Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire 31 ème congrès de la BCLA : 31 mai-3juin, Manchester, Grande-Bretagne / Seang-Mei Saw in LRO : La Revue d'Optométrie et de contactologie, 22 (Juillet 2007)
[article]
in LRO : La Revue d'Optométrie et de contactologie > 22 (Juillet 2007) . - 14-19
Titre : 31 ème congrès de la BCLA : 31 mai-3juin, Manchester, Grande-Bretagne Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Seang-Mei Saw, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : 14-19 Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]Actes de congrès
[Thésaurus Mesh]MyopiePermalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Périodique Erasme - périodiques Périodiques Disponible Accommodation in Children after 4.7 Years of Multifocal Contact Lens Wear in the BLINK Study Randomized Clinical Trial / Moriah A. Chandler in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, Vol.100, 07 (Juillet 2023)
[article]
in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science > Vol.100, 07 (Juillet 2023)
Titre : Accommodation in Children after 4.7 Years of Multifocal Contact Lens Wear in the BLINK Study Randomized Clinical Trial Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Moriah A. Chandler ; Matthew L. Robich ; Lisa Jones-Jordan ; Donald Mutti ; David A. Berntsen ; Rachel Fenton ; Elizabeth Day ; Jeffrey J. Walline Année de publication : 2023 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]Accommodation oculaire
[Thésaurus Mesh]Enfant
[Thésaurus Mesh]Étude comparative
[Thésaurus Mesh]Lentilles de contact
[Thésaurus Mesh]Myopie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Thérapeutique
[Thésaurus HELB]:Optique:port de lentilles de contactMots-clés : lentilles de contact multifocales souples longue durée Résumé : SIGNIFICANCE
When worn for myopia control in children, soft multifocal contact lenses with a +2.50 D add reduced the accommodative response over a 3-year period, but wearing them for more than 4 years did not affect accommodative amplitudes, lag, or facility.
PURPOSE
This study aimed to compare the accommodative response to a 3D stimulus between single-vision, +1.50-D add, and +2.50-D add multifocal contact lens wearers during 3 years of contact lens wear and then to compare accommodative amplitude, lag, and facility between the three groups after an average of 4.7 years of wear.
METHODS
Bifocal Lenses In Nearsighted Kids study participants aged 7 to 11 years old were randomly assigned to wear single-vision, +1.50-D add, or +2.50-D add soft contact lenses (CooperVision, Pleasanton, CA). The accommodative response to a 3D stimulus was measured at baseline and annually for 3 years. After 4.7 years, we measured objective accommodative amplitudes, lead/lag, and binocular facility with ±2.00-D flippers. We compared the three accommodative measures using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), adjusting for clinic site, sex, and age group (7 to 9 or 10 to 11 years).
RESULTS
The +2.50-D add contact lens wearers exhibited lower accommodative response than the single-vision contact lens wearers for 3 years, but the +1.50-D add contact lens wearers exhibited only lower accommodative response than did the single-vision contact lens wearers for 2 years. After adjustment for clinic site, sex, and age group, there were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences between the three treatment groups for accommodative amplitude (MANOVA, P = .49), accommodative lag (MANOVA, P = .41), or accommodative facility (MANOVA, P = .87) after an average of 4.7 years of contact lens wear.
CONCLUSIONS
Almost 5 years of multifocal contact lens wear did not affect the accommodative amplitude, lag, or facility of children.Permalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire Accommodative Behavior, Hyperopic Defocus, and Retinal Image Quality in Children Viewing Electronic Displays / Raman Prasad Sah in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 97, 08 (Aout 2020)
[article]
in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science > vol. 97, 08 (Aout 2020)
Titre : Accommodative Behavior, Hyperopic Defocus, and Retinal Image Quality in Children Viewing Electronic Displays Type de document : article de périodique Auteurs : Raman Prasad Sah ; Viswanathan Ramasubramanian ; Olivia Reed ; Dawn Meyer ; Arthur Bradley ; Pete Kollbaum Année de publication : 2020 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs (mots clés) : [Thésaurus Mesh]Accommodation oculaire
[Thésaurus Mesh]Enfant
[Thésaurus Mesh]Myopie
[Thésaurus Mesh]Prévalence
[Thésaurus HELB]:Paramédical:écrans numériquesPermalink : https://bibliotheque.helb-prigogine.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id= [article]Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire Accomodation, Nearwork and Myopia / Editha Ong
PermalinkAccuracy and Precision of New Optical Biometer Designed for Myopia Management in Measurement of Ocular Biometry / Sruthi Chamarty in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 100, 11 (Novembre 2023)
PermalinkAge six , the refractive error milestone? / Sarah Morgan in OPTOMETRY TODAY, vol. 60, 07 (Aout-septembre 2020)
PermalinkAltered Expression of GJD2 Messenger RNA and the Coded Protein Connexin 36 in Negative Lens–induced Myopia of Guinea Pigs / Qiurong Zhu in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 97, 12 (Décembre 2020)
PermalinkAmerican Academy of Optometry : Academy 2010 / Jane Gwiazda in LRO : La Revue d'Optométrie et de contactologie, 36 (Janvier 2011)
PermalinkLes anomalies de la vision chez l'enfant et l'adolescent / Caroline Kovarski
PermalinkArtificial Intelligence : computer says go / Stephanie Campbell in OPTOMETRY TODAY, vol. 63, 03 (Juin 2023)
PermalinkAssociation between Global Myopia Prevalence and International Levels of Education / Monica Jong in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 100, 10 (Octobre 2023)
PermalinkAssociation of Total Zinc Intake with Myopia in U.S. Children and Adolescents / Niamh Burke in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 96, 09 (Septembre 2019)
PermalinkAssociations between Binocular Vision Disorders and Contact Lens Dissatisfaction / Daniel Tilia in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 98, 10 (Octobre 2021)
PermalinkAsymmetric Peripheral Refraction Profile in Myopes along the Horizontal Meridian / Vijay Kumar Yelagondula in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 99, 04 (Avril 2022)
PermalinkAvancées en ophtalmologie : prévention de la myopie, traitements innovants pour la sécheresse oculaire et nouveautés en dégénérescence maculaire liée à l’âge / D. Lipski in Revue médicale de Bruxelles, vol. 44, 04 (Septembre 2023)
PermalinkBCLA 2000 (British Contact Lens Association) / Kévin Le Trividic in LRO : La Revue d'Optométrie et de contactologie, 35 (Octobre 2010)
PermalinkBifocal & atropine in myopia study : baseline data and methods / Juan Huang in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 96, 05 (Mai 2019)
PermalinkBilan, choix de la technique opératoire et rôle de l’orthoptiste en consultation de chirurgie réfractive / Mikael Guedj in Revue Francophone d'Orthoptie, vol. 13, 02 (Avril-juin 2020)
PermalinkCase report: adaptation of a telescope with a minus lens cap for highly myopic patient / Tracy L. Matchinski in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 96, 06 (Juin 2019)
PermalinkCase Report: Transient Myopic Shift and Other Sequelae in Response to Adverse Reaction to Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim / John S Whorff in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 97, 08 (Aout 2020)
PermalinkChick Eyes Can Recover from Lens Compensation without Visual Cues / Xiaoying Zhu in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 97, 08 (Aout 2020)
PermalinkPermalinkChirurgie réfractive : myopie, hypermétropie, astigmatisme, presbytie / Catherine Albou-Ganem
PermalinkLa chirurgie réfractive de la myopie : quel bilan après 30 ans ? / Jean-Jacques Saragoussi in La revue du praticien, vol. 67, 4 (Avril 2017)
PermalinkPermalinkClinical methods for slowing childhood myopia progression / Carly SY Lam in OPTOMETRY TODAY, vol. 60, 05 (Mai 2020)
PermalinkClinical Outcomes of a Randomized Trial with Contact Lenses for Astigmatic Myopia Management / Erin S. Tomiyama in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 100, 01 (Janvier 2023)
PermalinkComparison of Factors Associated with Myopia among Middle School Students in Urban and Rural Regions of Anhui, China / Wei Peng in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 99, 9 (septembre 2022)
PermalinkComparison of Myopia Progression among Myopic Children with Intermittent Exotropia and No Strabismus / Suzie Kim in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 100, 08 (Aout 2023)
PermalinkComparison of Three Different Devices for the Evaluation of Axial Length, Refractive Error, and Keratometry / Philipp Hessler in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 100, 08 (Aout 2023)
PermalinkPermalinkContrast Sensitivity with Center-distance Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses / Augustine N. Nti in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 99, 04 (Avril 2022)
PermalinkContrôle de la myopie avec les lentilles de contact / Jacinto Santodomingo in LRO : La Revue d'Optométrie et de contactologie, 59 (Octobre 2016)
PermalinkContrôle de la myopie avec des lentilles de jour : lentilles souples à défocalisation périphérique. / Christelle Nkie adjaba
PermalinkContrôle de la myopie : différentes facettes en un clin d’œil / Jean-Pierre Lagacé in L'optométriste (UNIQUEMENT ACCESSIBLE EN PDF), vol. 43, 03 (Mai-juin 2021)
PermalinkCours d'optométrie / Jean-Charles Allary
PermalinkCustomizing myopia treatment : the ABCs of myopia management : from atropine to Zernike polynomials / Eef Van Der Worp in Global contact, 87 (Janvier-avril 2021)
PermalinkEffect of Time Outdoors and Near-viewing Time on Myopia Progression in 9- to 11-year-old Children in Chongqing / Yujie Fan in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 99, 06 (Juin 2022)
PermalinkEffect of Vision Therapy on Accommodative Lag in Myopic Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial / Martin Ming-Leung Ma in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 96, 01 (Janvier 2019)
PermalinkEffets de l’accommodation sur les défauts optiques périphériques dans les yeux emmétropes et myopes / P. Artal in LRO : La Revue d'Optométrie et de contactologie, 30 (Juillet 2009)
PermalinkEfficacy in Myopia Control: Does Race Matter? / Mark A. Bullimore in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 100, 01 (Janvier 2023)
PermalinkEnvironmental and Behavioral Factors with Refractive Error in Israeli Boys / Ariela Gordon-Shaag in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 98, 08 (Aout 2021)
PermalinkL’esophorie-tropie au cours des myopies fortes / Christophe Orssaud in Revue Francophone d'Orthoptie, vol. 13, 04 (Octobre-décembre 2020)
PermalinkEthical considerations of myopia management / Whayeb Yasmin in OPTOMETRY TODAY, vol. 63, 06 (Novembre-décembre 2023)
PermalinkEtude rétrospective de la prise en charge orthoptique chez les jeunes sujets myopes bénéficiant d’un dispositif de lentilles orthokératologiques / Zahra Kazemy
PermalinkPermalinkÉvaluation de l’examen optométrique d’un jeune myope présentant des maux de tête / R. Shah in LRO : La Revue d'Optométrie et de contactologie, 27 (Septembre 2008)
PermalinkPermalinkFighting Myopia with Intermittent Nearwork Breaks: 20 Seconds Every 20 Minutes Might Not Be Enough Time / Andrew D. Pucker in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 100, 01 (Janvier 2023)
PermalinkFirst reference curve for refraction in Central Europ created : myopia progression is much higher in China and Korea than in Germany / Carolin Truckenbrod in Global contact, 87 (Janvier-avril 2021)
PermalinkPermalinkHelping parents understand their child’s myopia: a ‘dual purpose’ approach / Sarah Morgan in OPTOMETRY TODAY, vol. 60, 08 (Octobre-novembre 2020)
PermalinkIntérêt du bilan préopératoire dans le choix d’une technique de chirurgie réfractive myopique : Analyse d’un cas clinique / Eléonore Taisne
PermalinkIntraocular Pressure and Myopia Progression, Axial Length Elongation in Rural Chinese Children / Jue Lin in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 100, 10 (Octobre 2023)
PermalinkIs binocular vision a critical component of myopia management? / Sara Mccullough in OPTOMETRY TODAY, vol. 60, 08 (Octobre-novembre 2020)
PermalinkIs There Any Association between Nutrition and Myopia? A Systematic Review / Sruthi Chamarty in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, Vol.100, 07 (Juillet 2023)
PermalinkLocalisation d’objets dans des scènes brouillées et désorganisées : différences entre observateurs myopes et emmétropes / Guillaume Giraudet in LRO : La Revue d'Optométrie et de contactologie, 21 (Avril 2007)
PermalinkLongitudinal Changes in Optical Quality, Spatial Vision, and Depth Vision after Laser Refractive Surgery for Myopia / Samrat Sarkar in OVS : Optometry & Vision Science, vol. 97, 05 (Mai 2020)
Permalink